I apologize to those who may have been waiting, sometimes one just has to chill for a while, as promised however here are the beginning of the McCarthy Tetrault files.. this is just a sneak peak..
McCarthy
Tetrault and its undue Influences on the Judicial and Regulatory
System:
McCarthy Tetrealt is among the most
powerful in law firms in North America, certainly Canada. It was the
main influence in the development of the BC Securities Act 1996
(rsbc). It wields much more influence over constitutional policy
matters and our judicial system in seemingly every province then it
should , its arms include at the very least financial and media
branches that are not insignificant.
McCarthy Tetrault is the outside legal
firm that the BC Securities Commission uses to do its dirty work and
attempt to intimidate people into silence as well as help the BCSC
find new ways to hide and commit crimes.
How can a Law Firm operate ethically
and free of conflict of interest when it writes the rules for a game
in which it gets to play against everyone else?
We want to make it clear that we
understand that not all employees at McCarthy Tetrault (like in any
agency) are aware of the sinister agenda and actions of their
employer. We are certain their are many individuals who truly mean
well and have no involvement in the criminal behavior of a few.
Unfortunately however for some time certain members of McCarthy
Tetrault as well as policies and actions indicate that there are
elements inside McCarthy Tetrault that are criminal and treasonous.
McCarthy Tetrault Blogs
The following are list of its Blogs
which on the surface are innocent enough, it is the number and scale
however that allows them to create a media machine that upholds its
image as a premier squeeky clean law firm that upholds the law and
protects peoples rights. In the meantime all policy and actions of
the firm McCarthy Tetrault seem to indicate an agenda that is
sinister in nature and should be very concerning for all who value
truth, human rights, freedom, etc.
There is nothing criminal about these blogs however the influence of them should not be ignored.
Questions about Media related to
McCarthy Tetrault.
A whole host of privately owned
digital media companies appear to have connections to McCarthy
Tetrault LLP. The links to some of them are posted below
Of concern are the theme's of some of
these 'news sites for industry insiders' as they describe themselves,
one is called Above the Law.
Okay, maybe they are having a bit of
fun with things, a creative licence for branding however when the
next website that are associated with it are others such as Break
Gov, Above the Law Redline, and Breaking Defence you begin to wonder
if McCarthy Tetrealt does not have a hidden agenda and is simply
flaunting it abuse of the Rule of Law in public while pushing its
propaganda.
See the following snapshot
Is McCarthy Tetrault trying to send a
subliminal message to the legal community through its affiliations
with 'Insider' Media sites such as Above the Law?
See the arms of the private media
group Breaking Media in the snapshot below. Who owns Breaking Media, who are the
investors?
We have some serious questions for McCarthy Tetrault and their client BCSC CEO Brenda Leong, among them why does the BCSC CEO feel the need to hire an outside law firm to defend herself?
McCarthy Tetrault and a few of its
Criminal Activities
Exerts from the Water Wars saga
include further evidence of the criminal actions of Canada's largest
and most powerful law firm.
This section is copied from the
website http://www.waterwarcrimes.com/..
The direct link will be provided below.
*********************************************************************************
“What
you are going to read here, you will not find on the McCarthy
Tetrault web site.
You can read McCarthy Tetrault's puffery and platitudinous self-aggrandizement on its web site at: http://www.mccarthy.ca/about_mccarthy_tetrault.aspx
This role of McCarthy Tetrault in the “Water War Crimes” that took place in respect of the proposed sale of bulk water to the United States is largely hidden. These pages shed some light on that story and is divided into seven parts as follows:
Part 1. Insider Trading Facilitated By McCarthy Tetrault.
Part 2: McCarthy Tetrault Conceals Conflict of Interest.
Part 3: The Judicial Robbery of Ms. Gibbs by a Former McCarthy Tetrault Partner.
Part 4: McCarthy Tetrault Recruits Chretien Advisor - John Manley.
Part 5: McCarthy Tetrault Partner, Tim Murphy, Infiltrates Prime Minister Paul Martin's Office.
Part 6: McCarthy Tetrault Infiltrates the Law Society of British Columbia.
Part 7: McCarthy Tetrault Infiltrates the Office of the BC Provincial Court Chief Judge.
Part 8: McCarthy Tetrault Infiltrates the Supreme Court of Canada.
You can read McCarthy Tetrault's puffery and platitudinous self-aggrandizement on its web site at: http://www.mccarthy.ca/about_mccarthy_tetrault.aspx
This role of McCarthy Tetrault in the “Water War Crimes” that took place in respect of the proposed sale of bulk water to the United States is largely hidden. These pages shed some light on that story and is divided into seven parts as follows:
Part 1. Insider Trading Facilitated By McCarthy Tetrault.
Part 2: McCarthy Tetrault Conceals Conflict of Interest.
Part 3: The Judicial Robbery of Ms. Gibbs by a Former McCarthy Tetrault Partner.
Part 4: McCarthy Tetrault Recruits Chretien Advisor - John Manley.
Part 5: McCarthy Tetrault Partner, Tim Murphy, Infiltrates Prime Minister Paul Martin's Office.
Part 6: McCarthy Tetrault Infiltrates the Law Society of British Columbia.
Part 7: McCarthy Tetrault Infiltrates the Office of the BC Provincial Court Chief Judge.
Part 8: McCarthy Tetrault Infiltrates the Supreme Court of Canada.
Part 1: Insider Trading Facilitiated By McCarthy Tetrault
In
September 1989, the Government of British Columbia, secretly and
illegally, violated the newly entered trade agreement between Canada
and the United States known as the
Canada US Free Trade Agreement or
CUSFTA.
It did this by granting to a Vancouver company, W.C.W. Western Canada
Water Enterprises Ltd. (WCW), favorable terms for access to fresh
water for export that were not made available to anyone else,
including American business enterprises, a right the American
government had secured by the treaty, CUSFTA,
with Canada. Usually,
a company like WCW, was required to disclose the material terms of a
contract like its September 1989 Agreement if it was offering shares
for sale through a stock exchange. This is the general rule in
Securities legislation throughout North America.
The problem WCW had that was that its September 1989 Agreement was illegal. The Agreement was a violation of the CUSFTA and a violation of the Water Act, domestic legislation passed by the legislature of British Columbia. If WCW wished to sell its shares and disclosed to the market place the real terms of its Agreement there would have been be a hue and cry from its competitors, heads would roll inside the Ministry of the Attorney General for British Columbia,and the British Columbia Government would have been be forced to provide a similar opportunity to other companies in the bulk water export business thereby depriving WCW of the advantage it has secretly acquired. To solve its problem, WCW retained McCarthy Tetrault, and through devious and undisclosed means, McCarthy Tetrault persuaded the Ontario Securities Commission to grant WCW an unique exemption from full and open disclosure of the material terms of its September 1989 Agreement. In this manner, McCarthy Tetrault assisted an insider trading scheme carried out by (WCW) that saw some shareholders and privileged insiders benefit secret knowledge.
This web site is the first official publication of theses facts which have been a closely guarded secret by McCarthy Tetrault, the Government of British Columbia and the Government of Canada.
In 2004, in a warehouse in Burnaby, B.C. , Mr. Carten, with the assistance of Colin Beach, the president of Aquasource Ltd, examined the WCW corporate files that proved McCarthy Tetrault had been a party to what can be fairly described as a massive stock market fraud.
The involvement of McCarthy Tetrault in a stock market fraud, a criminal or quasi-criminal activity, explains much of perverse conduct by McCarthy Tetrault and its agents towards Mr. Carten and Ms Gibbs between 1997 and the present date - that is described below.
The problem WCW had that was that its September 1989 Agreement was illegal. The Agreement was a violation of the CUSFTA and a violation of the Water Act, domestic legislation passed by the legislature of British Columbia. If WCW wished to sell its shares and disclosed to the market place the real terms of its Agreement there would have been be a hue and cry from its competitors, heads would roll inside the Ministry of the Attorney General for British Columbia,and the British Columbia Government would have been be forced to provide a similar opportunity to other companies in the bulk water export business thereby depriving WCW of the advantage it has secretly acquired. To solve its problem, WCW retained McCarthy Tetrault, and through devious and undisclosed means, McCarthy Tetrault persuaded the Ontario Securities Commission to grant WCW an unique exemption from full and open disclosure of the material terms of its September 1989 Agreement. In this manner, McCarthy Tetrault assisted an insider trading scheme carried out by (WCW) that saw some shareholders and privileged insiders benefit secret knowledge.
This web site is the first official publication of theses facts which have been a closely guarded secret by McCarthy Tetrault, the Government of British Columbia and the Government of Canada.
In 2004, in a warehouse in Burnaby, B.C. , Mr. Carten, with the assistance of Colin Beach, the president of Aquasource Ltd, examined the WCW corporate files that proved McCarthy Tetrault had been a party to what can be fairly described as a massive stock market fraud.
The involvement of McCarthy Tetrault in a stock market fraud, a criminal or quasi-criminal activity, explains much of perverse conduct by McCarthy Tetrault and its agents towards Mr. Carten and Ms Gibbs between 1997 and the present date - that is described below.
Part 2: McCarthy Tetrault Conceals Conflict of Interest
When
Mr. Carten obtained a copy of the contract between WCW and the
Government of British Columbia, in 1997, he immediately concluded
that it was a violation of the CUSFTA and, being completely unaware
that McCarthy Tetrault had previously acted for WCW, contacted
McCarthy Tetrault office in Ottawa to provide a confirming legal
opinion.
Instead of advising Mr. Carten that it had “a conflict of interest” due to its prior involvement with WCW, McCarthy Tetrault agreed to provide Mr. Carten with the confirming legal opinion.
A copy of the McCarthy Tetrault legal opinion, signed by Riaz Dattu, shown in the photo, can be found online at: http://www.sunbeltwater.com/images/mccarthy_legal_opinion.pdfThe astute observer will recognize the tactic employed by McCarthy Tetrault against Mr. Carten was a deception. Under generally accepted principles of legal ethics and commercial morality, McCarthy Tetrault should have declined the retainer. However, by accepting the retainer, McCarthy Tetrault became privy to confidential information from Mr. Carten and his client Sun Belt Water Inc.
With one hand, McCarthy Tetrault offered trust and a fiduciary relationship and with the other hand it reached out to stab Mr. Carten in the back.”
Source - http://www.waterwarcrimes.com/1-law-firm---mccarthy-tetrault---canadas-many-headed-water-serpent.html
Instead of advising Mr. Carten that it had “a conflict of interest” due to its prior involvement with WCW, McCarthy Tetrault agreed to provide Mr. Carten with the confirming legal opinion.
A copy of the McCarthy Tetrault legal opinion, signed by Riaz Dattu, shown in the photo, can be found online at: http://www.sunbeltwater.com/images/mccarthy_legal_opinion.pdfThe astute observer will recognize the tactic employed by McCarthy Tetrault against Mr. Carten was a deception. Under generally accepted principles of legal ethics and commercial morality, McCarthy Tetrault should have declined the retainer. However, by accepting the retainer, McCarthy Tetrault became privy to confidential information from Mr. Carten and his client Sun Belt Water Inc.
With one hand, McCarthy Tetrault offered trust and a fiduciary relationship and with the other hand it reached out to stab Mr. Carten in the back.”
Source - http://www.waterwarcrimes.com/1-law-firm---mccarthy-tetrault---canadas-many-headed-water-serpent.html
********************************************************************************
This is just sneak peak as the criminal behavior of one of Canada's most prestigious law firms, as always stay tuned for more.. The next leaks will include serious criminal offences committed by McCarthy Tetrault
As always stay tuned for more
As always stay tuned for more
No comments:
Post a Comment