Monday, 26 March 2018

BCIMC, BCSC, Serco, The BC Attorney General Office, All Connected To RICO Crime?



   RICO - Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations and Your Government

What is RICO and how does it apply to the BC Securities Commission, the BCIMC, and numerous other individuals and public/corporate bodies in both Canada and the US?

 ( BREAKING NEWS UPDATE, The bcIMC has changed its website and no longer goes by the title bcIMC. The BC Investment Management Corporation is now known as BCI and can be found at www.BCI.ca. We believe this may have been done in response to mounting public questions and concern regarding the crimes that have been committed by certain BCI/bcIMC employees. Links to the bcIMC that were part of articles regarding the bcIMC may no longer work due to the recent changes. The BC Investment Management Corporation can change its name but it will not be able to hide its crimes any longer..)



The posting that follows could be considered a sequel to the blog entry in January of this year seen here,
The Investment Funds Institute Of Canada, BCIMC, BCSC, KPMG, and Paul Bourque.

In order to continue to properly frame the magnitude of the crimes taking place we must first have a quick review of the RICO Act and its various counterparts in their respective nations. We will then move on to further connections between the BCIMC, the BCSC, and various entities including a multinational communications firm named Serco with many government contracts around the globe.
 The purpose of this post as with the post referred to above is to outline the types of connections that exist between corporations and our government bodies which may be used to continue to commit mass fraud and embezzlement of the public not only in Canada but around the globe. Much of this post will focus on the BCSC as an example of regulatory failure, and the bcIMC as a crown pension fund and how it stands to profit from such systematic 'failures' at best and blatant criminal offences at worst.
 We understand and are aware that the situation runs broader and deeper then the BCSC, bcIMC and the problems here out West however the purpose of this post is simply to outline the connections that exist that allow manipulation of information and control of our governments communications systems by financial institutions with ties to global money laundering, terrorism, drug epidemics, and fraud and of course your financial regulators.

The RICO Act could apply to many of the various stories, broad range of topics and cases we have covered in this blog.

 The RICO act is a US Federal Law passed in 1970, see exert from Nolo Legal Encyclopedia below,

                                                         *************************

"Passed in 1970, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a federal law designed to combat organized crime in the United States. It allows prosecution and civil penalties for racketeering activity performed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise. Such activity may include illegal gambling, bribery, kidnapping, murder, money laundering, counterfeiting, embezzlement, drug trafficking, slavery, and a host of other unsavory business practices.
To convict a defendant under RICO, the government must prove that the defendant engaged in two or more instances of racketeering activity and that the defendant directly invested in, maintained an interest in, or participated in a criminal enterprise affecting interstate or foreign commerce. The law has been used to prosecute members of the mafia, the Hells Angels motorcycle gang, and Operation Rescue, an anti-abortion group, among many others."

 Source-
Nolo - Legal-Encyclopedia/RICO Act

                                                        **************************

  You can see the US Justice Departments specifications of the RICO Act here
US Dept Of Justice-9-110.000 - Organized Crime And Racketeering

   They run through a broad ranging number of crimes including embezzlement, extortion, and financial fraud of all kinds as well as crimes against property and person.
  To further understand RICO Crimes see the exert below from Federal Charges, a legal help site.

                                                       ***************************

How It Works

To successfully prosecute for RICO it must be shown that members of a criminal enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering that had an effect on interstate commerce. Those elements need to be broken down for an explanation:
  1. Criminal Enterprise – Any organization that works together over time and has an organizational structure with one or more persons making decisions for the organization. The enterprise can have either an illegal or a legal purpose.
  2. Pattern of Racketeering – The members of the organization must have engaged in ongoing illegal activity. At least two predicate crimes (explained below) must have been committed. Two separate and unrelated crimes are not considered a pattern of racketeering. There must be some kind of ongoing scheme of criminal activity.
  3. Effect on Interstate Commerce – This merely refers to anything that has any effect on commerce when that effect is not entirely limited to one state. Any economic activity of any substance normally meets the criteria.

Predicate Crimes

RICO charges cannot be filed against people who engage in any criminal activity. The statute lists particular criminal activity. These underlying crimes that can trigger RICO charges are called predicate crimes. Some examples of the listed crimes are:
  • Money laundering
  • Extortion
  • Gambling
  • Murder
  • Bribery
  • Securities Fraud
  • Dealing in obscene material
  • Drug trafficking
  • Embezzlement
The above list is not comprehensive. As you can see from what is listed, the possible predicate crimes for RICO charges span a wide range of criminal activity and include white collar crimes.

 See source for more-
 https://www.federalcharges.com/understanding-rico-conspiracy-charges/

                                                        *************************

   It should be noted that according to Wikipedia Canada has similar laws regarding RICO crimes,

 See exert below,

                                                        *************************

International equivalents to RICO[edit]

The US RICO legislation has other equivalents in the rest of the world. In spite of Interpol having a standardized definition of RICO-like crimes, the interpretation and national implementation in legislation (and enforcement) widely varies. Most nations cooperate with the US on RICO enforcement only where their own related laws are specifically broken, but this is in line with the Interpol protocols for such matters.
By nation, alphabetically
Source -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act

                                                       *************************


 We have already visited the conflict of interest that is created through having a Self Regulating Organization (SRO) like the BCSC that is supposed to be a fair and unbiased financial market regulator own financial securities in the market it regulates. See Conflicts Of Interest and The Sham That is Compliance  We then covered how the BCSC owns securities in a corporation (the bcIMC) that does business in the market it regulates here, BCSC Holds BCIMC Securities, Does the BCSC Know the Meaning of Words Like Conflict Of Interest and Integrity? and below among other posts on the subject, BCSC, BCIMC, Pepsi Co, and Coca Cola.

 Now lets have a look at some of the other interesting connections and relationships that may involve the BCIMC, and/or the BCSC. First up we ask why the BC Attorney Generals office under former Attorney General Ms. Susan Anton has never done anything about the well documented crimes that have plagued BC for years despite being made aware of many of them? These crimes include the crimes against the English Family seen here, http://cuabcimc.blogspot.ca/.
 Crimes against Mr. Harold Blanes seen here, WWII Vet Appalled at Lack of Rule of Law in Canada.

 Crimes against myself (author of blog) and shareholders of Spyru/U-Go Brands some of which details can be seen here, Why All the Unpaid Fines Owed to The BC Securities Commission?. See recent development on this case here THE MAGICIANS AT THE BC SECURITIES COMMISSION MAKE $35,000,000 DISAPPEAR!. (The BCSC has dropped millions in disgorgement penalties against myself, the author of this blog and in various other cases.) We believe this is so that they can begin to attempt cover their %$* so to speak for wrong doing in numerous cases as we have detailed in this blog.

 Further crimes include another ongoing massive RICO fraud we believe is still unfolding in regards to St. Elias Mines which had a former ticker symbol of SLI which traded on the NY Stock Exchange as well as TSX.
 A little on this story can be seen here, more to come in the future on this huge story.. The suspected  theft of what was supposedly huge find of gold in South America.
What Does The BCSC Do All Day? It Certainly Doesnt Administrate Justice!

 There is of course also the issue of Barrick Gold and its various connections to the events leading up to and surrounding the false flag attacks on 9/11, the Bushes, international arms dealer Adnan Kashoggi and the CIA as well as its nefarious dealings in third world countries around the globe.
 How does such a corporation commit such atrocities as well as collude to rig the gold market without any interference or questioning from the financial regulators in Canada?

If such a massive RICO ring does exist what would it look like here in BC?
Well in this case it all starts with the BC Ministry of Justice in BC, how does one cover their tracks and ensure that a case against the Cabal which runs this syndicate never has a chance at real success?

 It all starts with control of communications, we have already described to you how the BCIMC holds or is associated with hundreds if not more companies around the globe. We have covered how the BCIMC used terrorist and mob extortion tactics in collusion with public officials and law enforcement officers among others  in order to steal a $200 million dollar ocean front property owned by a Mr. English and his family in Tofino. In this case every legal avenue has seemingly been shut down for Mr. English as most authorities refuse to admit any crimes have taken place at all despite mounds of obvious evidence to the contrary. The BC Ministry of Justice's office has been compromised for a long time, even a well meaning Attorney General will have a hard time getting any real work done when their offices communications are not under their own control.

 So who controls the communications of the BC Ministry of Justice? Certainly not the BC Government or its the people of British Columbia. A foreign company out of London, England named Serco is responsible for 'securing' our all of our communications regarding issues at the BC Ministry of Justice. See https://www.serco.com/

 Serco - Who Owns it and What is it About?

The people of British Columbia and the BC Government do not control the communications of one of the most important offices in the province, the BC Ministry of Justice. Also of grave concern is the fact that Serco controls communications for the Canadian Department of National Defence.
 See below


Source-
https://www.serco-na.com/clients

 Interestingly enough Serco is deeply embedded in running the communications systems for many agencies of the United States Government, from the US Department of Justice to the US Marines there are few areas of government in North America on both sides of the border that Serco does not touch. The same can be said for many other nations around the globe.
 See below


 Who owns Serco?
 According to the link provided below a range of various global funds and financial institutions hold Serco. Serco - Shareholders

 See an interesting look at Sercos UK operations which have been under flak for fraud over the last decade or so here, The Guardian - Can Winston Churchills Grandson Save Serco? Is It Worth Saving?

An exert from the Sydney Morning Herald gives a little more insight into the corporation that controls the communications for our British Columbia Ministry of Justice, see below.

                                                       **************************

Good business
There is good money in detention centres.
And given the cherished position of companies which win mandates to run privatised government assets, their duty of disclosure and transparency should be greater, not less.

Serco occupies a dominant position in the market. It has 8000 people in its care (almost 3000 of this country's 5000 people in immigration detention) and there are the interests of many stakeholders to be considered, not least the taxpayer, on whose behalf elected officers in Canberra have struck billions in secret contracts.
The lobbyists register shows Peter Costello's lobby group ECG Advisory Services (Jonathan Epstein, Peter Costello, David Gazard) has done work for Serco. What deals have been done? We do know that Serco has won $1.86 billion in contracts. Why are there no 'related party transactions' disclosed in the Serco accounts? What consultants are doing what? What are they earning, care of the taxpayer?
As the economic and political status of Serco has increased, rather than diminished, there is no justification for this plunge in reporting standards and disclosure.
“Serco and Deloitte seem to have taken a path of doing whatever it takes to avoid disclosures,” says Jeff Knapp. “Serco and Deloitte have some explaining to do. Who is going to hold them to account? The government, the corporate regulator (ASIC), the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia?
“Serco's transition from reporting entity in 2003 to non-reporting entity in 2012 is another in a growing list of known examples of bad financial reporting practice. That list seems to be growing in size even faster than Serco.”

  Source - What is Serco Hiding?

                                                        ***************************

 One has to remember that due to a large number of funds invested in companies like Serco it is not always possible to reveal in full who a companies owners are even if the company is public. Many private corporations can put money into these funds quietly without being traced easily.

 According the leaked video seen below Serco's shareholders/owners are the largest banks and financial institutions on the planet, many with less then stellar track records and reputations.

 See an exert from 21st Century Newswire below for a brief overview of Sercos' activities.

                                                     *************************

SERCO: ‘The biggest company you’ve never heard of’

21st Century Wire says…
As politicians asset-strip the public’s portfolio of properties, infrastructure and services, one multinational corporation has grown as a result – and its scope and reach may shock many people who have not been paying attention.
All around the globe, our governments are busy outsourcing public-sector services like health, education, police, prisons, money delivery and military –  to the esteemed private sector. It’s sold to the public as a solution to avoiding higher taxes, while retaining better services. But it’s simply an accountancy shell game, where the government kicks the can down the road by spreading the bill to the taxpayer over a longer period of time, in order to avoid any large upfront payments – all the while, allowing a private corporation to extend its influence over society. This, by definition, is fascism.
They are called SERCO, and they run countries…

 See source for the full story..

 See video below for more on Serco.


 
***********************
 

Why is this important to Canadians and the fight to restore the rule of law in North Americas financial systems?

The BC Ministry of Justice is Compromised, So Are the Financial Markets.
How did this Happen?

 Serco controls the communications for the BC Ministry Of Justice, this means that even if a BC Attorney General wanted to truly pursue the massive amount of financial crime they would be sabatoged from the beggining. Anyone attempting to pursue justice in BC Courts is hard pressed especially when up against any entity connected to the Ministry of Justice, bcIMC, or the BCSC as Serco is connected in one way or another to all of them.

 As we have mentioned Serco is owned by some of the largest financial institutions in the world and find themselves in a position to control the flow of information for many governements and competitors. Does one really beleive that they would not attempt to take advantage of this in a criminal manner given the already compelling evidence that they deal in deception?

 We are going to consider some companies which have ties to the bcIMC and by default the BCSC as we contuninue to unwravel the ties in what is essentially as massive RICO operation run inside North American governements at many levels. Once again we want to be clear this does not mean that every government official is involved and guilty. Many officials are not aware or do not understand the scope of what is going on, how is this posible one may ask? Many others are held hostage in some manner of speaking.
 This of course begins with the perversion and Destruction of the Rule of Law (International Business Times, See authors notes *) in our financial systems as well as now our law courts and judicial systems. The lack of understanding or adherance to the rule of law among public officials is a major issue.
 The system is flawed from the start and this is what allows a criminal element to easily manipulate cases and evidence for their own benefit. We will not detail all this in this article for brevity's sake however the following links may provide some insight. When do actions taken by a Gov't regulatory and enforcement agency lose the protection rendered by 'good faith' clauses and become crimes? Are public officials immune from prosecution for any crime committed during their course of duty by invoking a 'Good Faith' clause?

 We say Section 171 of The Securities Act (rsbc 1996) does not constitute the right of the Securities Commission to commit the various criminal offences we have alleged and outlined on this blog.

 Also see BC SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS NO REMEDY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT FOR CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR.

 Despite the insistance of many public officials that the BCSC is master of its own domain as a SRO (Self Regulating Organization), the truth is that according to the Rule of Law and the Fundamentals of Justice which supposedly govern this nation the BCSC like anyone else must operate within the confines of the law. We know this is not possible due to the many conflicts of interest that exist the organization is based upon.

For one the BC Securities Commission exists as a corporation that is self funded. It is the financial regulator for the securities markets in BC and must maintain the integrity of the markets and assure a fair and dynamic marketplace. It cannot do so when it exists by creating rules and regulations which must be broken in order for it to create revenue for itself.


  A self funded and self regulatory regulator cannot operate in a just and fair manner to ensure market integrity. By its very nature it will be inclined to self preservation and as such its employees and officers will be inclined to the same. This is how entrapment becomes a very possible reality.
We have covered much of this on this blog and in articles like this, Conflicts of Interest and the Sham that is 'Compliance'.

Now to demonstrate the connections. We already know that the BCSC is connected to the bcIMC through its holdings of securities with the bcIMC. We have covered the bcIMC and its connections to disgraced auditor KPMG as well as CAI Private Equity which continues to be involved in fraudulent activity as well as the massive theft of the English Families Tofino property in which it would appear that the bcIMC was a major player.
 If Serco and the bcIMC are somehow connected and Serco is running the BC Governments Justice department is it any wonder that cases like Mr. English's case against government officials are being buried in court and any chance at justice is continually obstructed? What about Mr. Alan Blanes and his fight for justice for his father and the nation? When they are up against major financial institutions, government pension funds and regulators themselves it becomes apparent whom the regulators really protect and its not the innocent victims.

 We know Serco is connected to the BC Ministry of Justice. Now lets look at companies which own Serco and also happen to be held by the bcIMC. Again one has to remember that due to a large number of funds invested in companies like Serco it is not always possible to reveal in full who a companies owners are even if the company is public. Many private corporations can put money into these funds quietly without being traced easily. Due to this as well as time and space constraints on this article not all companies connected are mentioned, these are just a few.

 It should also be noted that we are not suggesting that these companies are guilty automatically of the same crimes we have demonstrated are being commited by various governement officials in many levels of government on both sides of the border in this blog. We are simply demonstrating the type of connections that may be in place in order to facilitate such as RICO ring as we have been covering and demonstrating on this blog.

 We have used 2016 bcIMC Inventory Report from bcIMC for reference. See bcIMC 2016 Inventory Report.

 Bank of NY Mellon

 bcIMC owns $33 Million worth of Bank NY Mellon securities according to its own 2016 Investment Inventory report.


 Black Rock Holdings 

 bcIMC and Black Rock Inc.


See BlackRocks Serco Holdings

See source - http://investors.morningstar.com/ownership/shareholders-major.html?t=XBER:SEO

 Interestingly enough also owned by Black Rock Inc. and the bcIMC are shares in Federal Finance Minister Bill Morneau's Morneau Shepell Inc. according to the source below.

 Source - Major Shareholders in Morneau Shepell Inc.
 
More on Finance Minister Bill Morneau shortly but first we will continue with a couple more examples of holdings connecting Serco with the bcIMC.
 Remember Serco controls the BC Ministry of Justice communications and the BC Investment Management Corp (bcIMC) is the pension fund for many BC Public Servants including the provincial financial regulators the BCSC which hold Securities with bcIMC.

JP Morgan and Chase Co.


 bcIMC holds $163 Million in JP Morgan Chase and Co. JP Morgan and Chase and Co also happen to be listed as External Managing Partners of the bcIMC.

 bcIMC - JP Morgan Holdings


bcIMC - JP Morgan and Chase Managing Partners


Loyds Banking Group

 The bcIMC holds $62 Million in Loyds Securities

According to sources noted at the begining of this article Loyds is a shareholder in Serco PLC.

Northern Trust - Who is Custodian of the bcIMC?

 Northern Trust is the global custodian for bcIMC assests.


Northern Trust also happens to be connected to Serco according to the leaked video we posted at the begining of this article.

We could continue to run through links in this manner however we want to be brief as possible.
The purpose of this demonstration is to show how it could be possible for these financial institutions to subvert the rule of law through leveraging connections in a key investment (Serco) in order to not only protect their investments but continue to defraud the public worldwide.

  We now move on to Canadian Federal Finance Minister Mr. Bill Morneau and his connections to the bcIMC. Would his connections to bcIMC be one of the reasons he and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau are ignoring the ongoing crimes committed at the bcIMC?

 Morneau Shepell Inc, Black Rock and bcIMC.

 It will be very hard to reform the financial system in Canada when the coruption starts at the top.
Whether it be the refusal of Federal Finance Minister Mr. Morneau to speak of or recognize the COMER vs. Bank Of Canada case before Canadian Supreme Courts which would eliminate debt money and restore sovereign money to the people and/or the scandal regarding the involvment of Mr. Morneau and his firm Morneau Shepell Inc and its ties to offshore accounts, the finance ministry is compromised from the top.

  See Black Rocks Morneau Shepell holdings below

Morneau's connections to offshore accounts can be seen here at Offshore Leaks.

 Who else owns shares in Morneau Shepell?
The bcIMC of course!
 Here are the holdings of Morneau Shepell by the bcIMC seen at the bottom of this screen shot.


 Why is this important? Firstly this is the man who is in charge of Canada's finances, it is vital to understand who is investing in his firm in order to understand what possible influences the Finance Minister may have when acting for the nation. Second we note that the regulators will have a hard time going after Mr. Morneau for tax evasion or any other financial frauds when regulators like the BCSC own securities in the bcIMC which in turn owns securities in Morneau Shepell Inc. Its like the dog chasing its tail.. Its never going to work.
 Third we note that Mr. Morneau is very connected to Black Rock Inc. which is one of the primary advocates and will likely be a key beneficiary of the new Canadian Infrastructure Bank (CIB)
 See an article from CTV here for more on concerns with Black Rocks involvement in the new bank,
CTV - Federal Cabinet to Have Final Say On New Infrastructure Bank Projects - Morneau.

 An article in the Toronto Star highlights further concern regarding offshore tax evasion in Canada, it is simply being legalized and billions if not more is being siphoned out of the country.
How Offshore Banking is Costing Canada Billions of Dollars a Year

 Going back to the COMER case against the Bank of Canada it is absolutly criminal that this is even being considered. We have the ability as a nation to restore the Bank of Canada so that it can print its own sovereign currency without paying interest to a private cartel of bankers in order to finance the nation. Despite this ability a handful of powerful and corrupted bankers and public officials have stolen that power through the Basel Accords and forced the nation into debt to fund public projects.

 Now on top of that somehow Finance Minister Mr. Morneau and the Liberals have convinced the public that in order to continue to build infrastrcuture they need to attract foreign investment and partner with firms such as Black Rock in building public projects.
 What they are not telling the public is that these projects will cost the public more then if the Federal Government had just borrowed the money to finance the project never mind printing debt free money to do so.
 These private investors will want more then the standard interest rates the BOC currently pays on borrowed money. Mr. Morneau and Black Rock have found a new way to siphon even more cash from hardworking and innocent Canadians pockets. All with the help of regulators and crown corporations of course.

bcIMC And Offshore Banking Connections

 To go back to the bcIMC and its connections to organized crimes we note its connection to offshore investments and the Appleby Law Firm in Bermuda, a now well known offshore tax haven. See
https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/nodes/82022087




   The bcIMC is one of many sovereign wealth funds/crown corporations that have been colluding with a criminal cabal and siphoning money from the public however they can by running a variety of frauds often involving the theft of natural resources, properties and other valuable assets. The use of para-military force is not out of the question for this cabal as they strip the Canadian public of their wealth.

 An exert from a recent article on The Breaker news site sheds more light on the bcIMC and its offshore connections.

                                                          *********************

B.C. Crown corporation goes silent about its appearance in the Paradise Papers


Bob Mackin
British Columbia’s public sector pension investor is listed in the Paradise Papers, the database of offshore investments leaked to a German newspaper and published by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.
B.C. Investment Management Corporation, which goes by the brand bcIMC, reported $135.5 billion in assets under management for the year ended March 31, 2017. 
bcIMC and several related companies are in the database, including a bcIMC company registered in Bermuda at the tax haven’s now famous Appleby law firm. 
The database, which was published Nov. 17, shows bcIMC (USA) Realty Investments LP was incorporated July 23, 2013 at a Canon’s Court address in Hamilton, Bermuda. 
Before that, however, three bcIMC entites were shareholders of China Homes Limited, a company incorporated in Bermuda on Oct. 6, 1997 that closed Dec. 30, 2009. Its auditor was the Shanghai office of PricewaterhouseCoopers. 
China Homes shareholders included bcIMC International Real Estate (2002) Investment Corp., bcIMC International Real Estate (2002A) Investment Corp., and bcIMC (WCB AF) Investment Real Estate Investment Corp., all with registered offices at the Vancouver law firm Lawson Lundell. 
For a brief period — from March 15, 2002 to Nov. 13, 2002 — bcIMC’s 2014-retired CEO Douglas Pearce and vice-president of real estate Charles Swanson were directors of China Homes. The ICIJ database listed Pearce’s Brentwood Bay residence and the bcIMC office address.

Lawson Lundell is also the firm where BC Liberal leadership candidate Michael Lee was a partner from 2004 until he was elected to the Legislature last May in Vancouver Langara. Lee originally joined the firm in 1997 as an associate. His name appears on a B.C. Securities Commission form for an $849.6 million bcIMC Realty Corporation share offering in June 2015.

 For full story please continue to - B.C. Crown corporation goes silent about its appearance in the Paradise Papers

                                                         *********************
  We would like to note this is the same Lawson Lundell law firm that was petitioned by Mr. John English re the destruction and theft of his $200 Million dollar property near Tofino BC in January 2016. See here http://gangstersout.com/BCIMC.pdf.

 In this case Mr. English continues to attempt to press charges in BC Supreme Court however his efforts are constantly undermined by a compromised justice system. Even if the Judges or new BC Attorney General Mr. David Eby (We believe many officials are threatened with the lives of their friends and family at stake, threatened by said 'cabal' and hostage to a vast system of technological killing prowess, think the ability to disappear a plane or weaponize your car with control to crash or set up a crash see Abel Danger.org) are serious in their intents to pursue justice for the many wronged in this province such as in this case, they would no doubt be thwarted by the control maintained over the system as a whole by the current cabal that is in control of our governing bodies.

 What about the many others that have been wronged by a BC Government that has been complicit in the RICO activity of a global criminal cabal?

 Where are the financial regulators who should be regulating a corporation (crown or not) that does business in BC? Probably counting the money they made investing in the bcIMC. The circles continue..

 As always more to come..



* AUTHORS NOTE

  It should be noted that in the authors case mentioned in the International Business Times seen in this link a Private Detective out of the US has since alleged with good reason that at least one of the members of the Spyru/U-Go Brands companies was involved in defrauding his partners and shareholders. Why did it take a private detective out of the states to bring this info to light? Why the efforts by the BCSC to obstruct justice? Clearly the BCSC is dangerously inept at best and Criminal at worst, we believe a bit of both to be true. This was  done with help on both sides of the border in what this detective claims is a massive cross border RICO ring, with parties infiltrating many aspects of governement and law enforcement on both sides of the border but especially in the US. The Spyru/U-Go Brands case was simply one small case in a massive complex web that is run by various arms of the cabal itself. New rulings in the case of Poonian v. the BCSC in the BC Court Of Appeal have had significant positive implications for the author of this blog, a victory and step towards justice for Mr Thal Poonian is a victory for us all.
 It should also be noted that some stories/articles and evidence that may be critical of the BC Securities Commission and other various public officials/agencies seems to disappear from time to time from the internet. If the link to the International Business Times story listed does not work please contact bk1092003@yahoo.ca for original copy of the story.

Saturday, 17 February 2018

$480,000,000 Lawsuit Names BCSC Officials, Alleges Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Process, Failure To Disclose Evidence Etc.

 From BCSC Truth Movement,



                                                       ************************

LUNATICS AT THE BCSC ARE NAMED IN $480,000,000 LAWSUIT- JUST ANOTHER DAY ON GEORGIA STREET!


In an article from the Vancouver Sun, we find a businessman from the lower mainland is suing (among others) the British Columbia Securities Commission for an astounding $480 million.
The Sun reports “(Michael James) Savage’s expansive 43-page counter-claim alleges a “miscarriage of justice” as a result of wrongful conviction and defamatory statements that includes malicious prosecution, abuse of process, negligence, failure to disclose evidence, and breaches of his Charter of Rights.
Sounds familiar – Mr. Savage joins the ranks of dozens of people that are complaining about the gang of thugs down at the BCSC.
Unfortunately for Mr. Savage’s case, there is no doubt the BCSC will employ their infamous “escape route” (rather than tender valid arguments) –  in a similar lawsuit launched against the BCSC (and many of their staff), the spineless legal team representing the Defendants brought forward an application that would have seen that particular Plantiff bring forward $120,000 to cover the costs of the Defendants IF a judge found his allegations unwarranted.   How does a poor man get a case brought forward regarding the BCSC?
Again, Staff at the BCSC show their true colors and run to the hills – rather than to defend themselves!  What are they hiding?
Mr James – if you are reading this blog – please contact me via my blog as I would very much like to talk to you.   There are many of us!

 Source - Lunatics at BCSC Named in $450 Million Dollar Lawsuite, Just Another Day On Georgia St.

 More from BCSC Truthmovement
 BCSC A Tax Cheat? Form Your Own Opinion, You Decide..

 Also see..
Evidence Manipulation Part of the Modus Operandi at the BC Securities Commission

                                                         ***********************
More to come..

Monday, 12 February 2018

WILL CANADIAN MP'S EMPOWER FCAC TO PROTECT CANADIANS?


From the desk of Alan Blanes,

Mr. Blanes is a member of the Council of Canadians as well as the lead contact for the Canadian Chapter of the Public Banking Institute, we have previously shared many of Mr. Blanes writings and reports including the following from CBC Go Public. CBC Go Public Reports on Forged Documents, also see In Regards to SRO's - Self Regulating Organizations, and Finance Ministry Obstructs Justice for more from Mr. Blanes.

  The email copied below covers brings up some excellent points regarding the many deficiencies in the financial system and its regulatory bodies, there are many serious questions that we have been asking on this blog for some time now in regards to the complete lack of adherence to the rule of law in this nation.

 ************************


On Feb 12, 2018, at 2:16 AM, Alan Blanes <alanblanesarchive@gmail.com> wrote:

Good evening Bev and David ---
cc  Christopher Burke
cc Chris, office of Ron McKinnon, MP, and Jonathan, office of Elizabeth May, MP

Time to Decide on Surveying MPs on Expanding the Mandate of the FCAC to include analyzing and reporting breaches of law

I am extremely glad that there are people who are willing to take a critical look at the legal system, and who are not satisfied  with it being tainted, [a synonym for corrupt]. 
For the past couple of weeks I have been slowly getting a bit more functional, having had a luperon shot [anti-hormone] that knocks out all production of energy hormones, so that testosterone is not present in the system. This is a way to keep prostate cancer under some semblance of control. But it can cause a patient to be running at about 8% of normal energy. 

My dad, Harold Blanes will be 98 in two months. He does not feel that there is a great deal of time for him to see this fiasco of regulation brought to book, if it can be achieved within his lifetime. I suggest that we follow Judge Brandeis' maxim about the law being a pendulum. When there is a larger demand for one approach to how law is to be serving society, that approach will dominate. When another stream of thinking moves in another direction and that reaches a dominant critical mass, the law will move there. 

I think that most would agree that the law has been captured by the investment industry in recent years, and the hens have come home to roost, in the public seeing full-on just what that nightmare has been leading to. We can't let it go any further. There are societies like in Mexico, and Guatemala, were policing becomes an overt practical joke on the people. We have a choice: Do we abandon the British customary practices that meant that lawfulness has a denotative meaning, or do we continue down the willful blindness road - where we consciously allow the whole regulatory and governance system to be given some absurd "limitation of mandate" where they can't face breaches of the law in areas that they are supposed to be taking complaints? How could it ever have been allowed to degenerate to such a point, that we are paying for functionaries to disregard breaches of lawful practices, with a robotic chant of "not within our mandate". 

This has to stop - and stop now. No future generation should be subjected to such a dehumanizing and toxic role for supposed governance agencies. That is why I implore everyone to treat the current opportunity seriously. Last year, CBC GO PUBLIC had a number of segments on crimes being committed against banking and investment clients - by direction from management - using in many cases unwilling staff to carry out these atrocities. This is a momentous disclosure for those of us who have had our lives disrupted by years of SRO = a big dishonest practical joke. Such a documentary production as Erica Johnson and GO PUBLIC gave to us who want to end this horror, was a profound record of things hitherto only imagined, and/or experienced in isolation. I would like the help of Christopher Burke, publisher of the noted blog "THE BC SECURITIES COMMISSION IS A SHAM" to help format a survey of all MPs to ask their co-operation in getting the Federal Cabinet to act to empower the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada to have within its powers, to assess, question, and report all incidents of violations of all laws. This reporting should consist of reports to the company to ensure that the company understands what is required for lawful opening and modifying of investment accounts. It is also necessary that the areas of law that are violated by reported to all appropriate law enforcement channels at all government levels.  I hereby authorize Mr. Burke to publish this message as a letter in the referenced blog. 

Canadians are not naïve, after they have had years of exposure to unending, soul-destroying exposure to a system that is a fraud, when our canon of centuries of law exists to protect the veracity of commercial contracts, and gullible and disloyal political systems arose to accept favour from corporate leaders in exchange for denying the protection of all citizens by all laws. This is a shameful legacy, and we have to become re-aligned to a position of fidelity with what protects the trustworthiness of our commercial customs. 

I feel that this survey of MPs has to be carried out this month, since FCAC has said that will release its opinion on the June Finance Committee Hearings on the GO PUBLIC evidence, this quarter. We can either tolerate a non-committal statement of "we don't have the mandate to look at crimes" or we can lobby the Federal Government to give the FCAC the required authorizations, so this agency can be a part of protection of rule of law. I don't think we have any time to play around on this. We have to make it CLEAR to the Cabinet that Canadians are entitled to protection of a regime of rule of law, and not having savings played with by predators who have contempt for the interests and decisions of clients. It is time to find out who is interested in helping with this poll, and who would be willing to allow this torment to continue into the future. It is time to decide. 

Cordially,

Alan

                                                         ************************

Alan, we at BC Securities Commission a Sham would certainly be happy to participate in engaging the MPs once again on such matters,
 I feel many questions on such a poll are similar to some of the questions we have asked in the past on this blog.
 Empowering the Financial Consumer Agency Of Canada (FCAC) to assess such issues would certainly help however this would simply be one of many steps required to rebuilding accountability and restoring the true rule of law in the financial system in Canada.
 Ideally such an agency would be funded by sovereign money created by the Bank of Canada rather then borrowed debt money or worse even still being an agency that is also self funded like the BC Securities Commission. With sovereign debt free money such as COMER has been pushing for, along with empowering legislation an agency such as the FCAC could be truly empowered to ensure the rule of law is adhered to in the financial world as it should be for all Canadians.

 I am not aware of funding structures of some of these other institutions you have come across in your fight for justice such as the IIROC however if they are self funded like the BC Securities Commission is then they are based in a conflict of interest and cannot operate according to the fundamentals of justice. Furthermore these agencies are certainly self regulating, this continues the conflict of interest and ensures actions taken by such an agency as the BCSC become nothing more then predatory and self serving agencies that have lost their function as regulators. You and I know and understand this but the scary thing the public is barely aware of is that this has been status quo for a long time and the plans for a new national regulatory agency are certainly even worse for the future of financial justice in Canada. The new Capital Markets Stability Act and the new accompanying national regulator are simply just the next sham.

 Back to your call to give the FCAC more power to protect the rights of Canadians I fully agree that there must be an agency that protects the rights of the public across all financial spectrums.
 It is unfortunate that the British System of Law has deteriorated to such a point that laws are simply decrees that protect the guilty, however given the merits of case law I suppose it may be inevitable and eventual that this is the outcome. This is where a complete overhaul of our legal system is needed, are we still a colony of the Crown or a Sovereign nation? Its time for us as Canadians to decide, this decision of course means restoring our monetary system with Sovereign money and restoring our courts to operate under the true rule of law. This would also require a change in the way we appoint judges and how our law societies operate. Big topics for sure and ones we do not have time now in the meantime there is still much that can be done even within the framework of current law.
 Finances and the regulation of them must be conducted and held to the same standard of the law as any other crime, in tandem with this however the system must shed its arbitrary regulations that have no merit as far as being able to play a role in reducing criminal behavior or eliminating it. There are a myriad of these designed to create the illusion of protecting the public while they do nothing but collect fees and fines. In addition to this many regulators create 'awareness campaigns' that front as helpful guides for the public yet there true purpose is to create an environment where questions regarding the crime are shifted to blaming the victim for being dumb and uneducated rather then the criminal for committing the crime. See the BC Securities Commission InvestRight program as a prime example. While I certainly believe the public should educate themselves on financial matters much of what the BC Securities Commission has set up as protective measures are simply window dressing and do nothing to stop fraud. Why does the BCSC not mention in its InvestRight program that it has no interest in your best interests? See CBC report here. Why does the BCSC have no interest in your best interest?  We touched a little on this in Conflict of Interest and the Sham that is Compliance.
 
 Again this comes back to SRO's especially self funded SRO's who also regulate their own investments, these kinds of organizations are stuck in such a quagmire of conflict of interest it is impossible for adherence to the rule of law and the fundamentals of justice to exist. They cant put the publics best interest first when their best interest is their foremost concern due to the organizational structure of such an agency!

 Why do I bring this all up? In relation to the FCAC its important that this is not simply what it becomes. We need to look at everything that is currently wrong with agencies like the IIROC and the BCSC and ensure that the agencies tasked with moveing us foreward are not hindered by the same issues.

 As far as empowering the FCAC, again I believe that if set up properly this could be a powerful tool to help begin to restore justice in the financial world in Canada. Avoid the pitfalls we have seen agencies such as the BCSC and the IIROC fall into and furthermore task and enable the FCAC or an agency like it with reviewing and rewriting the rules and laws in our financial system so that they actually make sense and protect the public. The BCSC, the IIROC and their many counterparts who are unwilling to evolve restore justice and accept that we the people are going to restore the rule of law will be subject to the inquiry and prosecution of an agency that will be designed to truly uphold the law for the people. Will any of our MPs agree that such an agency would be good for the Canadian public?

 Our regulators are currently designed as corporations, their purpose is to make money. They cannot properly regulate when they are conflicted by the primary purpose of being a corporation. This is where the restoration of the Bank of Canada is so vital, once restored it must create sovereign money to inject into such organizations as financial regulators instead of forcing them to fund themselves. This will help take massive steps towards restoring the financial system in Canada and around the world. The Swiss are voting on this issue soon according to this report Swiss Votes on State Money from Daily Coin.. Its time to end debt money and begin restoring the rule of law.
 More to come

 Christopher Burke
250 863 9787




Wednesday, 31 January 2018

Why Would 13 Canadians Securities Commissions Intentionally Decieve Investors?


The following is an exert from Unpublished Ottawa on Regulatory Fraud,


From the Desk of Larry Elford,

                                                         *************************

Posted on January 29, 2018 | larry elford | Written on January 29, 2018
Comments
Letter type:
Open

Author's Note:

Author's Note:

My circle of malpractice and misconduct investigators can find no possible public interest benefit, and considerable public interest harm, in learning that Securities Commissions are 'aiding the industry' in deceiving, and hiding essential information from the public.
The video below shows (at the one minute mark) how the commissions in Canada informed the public about the difference between an investment salesperson and a registered investment adviser. (a fiduciary professional with a duty to "do no harm" to investors)  This 'clarity' was in place from September 2009 until January 2018, when for some reason, the commissions decided to eliminate some of the clarity for investors. They further removed (twice now) information which cautioned and informed investors.  Why?

Author's Video Note

 
This is how a "confidence man" works:
Prior to September of 2009, the license and registration category of your investment "advice giver" was (in 99% of cases) one of the following two choices:
a) a registered investment adviser (the "Do no harm" fiduciary professional)
or
b) a registered "salesperson"  (the one where they could act against the investor interests)
Investors were not well informed, back then, as most, if not all persons who were registered in the "salesperson" category preferred to call themselves by a non registered and non-regulated title, spelled "advisor".
By clever use of a single "Vowel Movement", millions of investors are deceived, and led to believe they have a "do no harm" fiduciary-duty professional, while the salesperson and the dealer have accomplished a clever bait and switch.  They will have convinced trusting clients that they are dealing with someone to be trusted, while actually hiding the saleperson's lesser duty of care.
“ the confidence man is someone who preys upon peoples confidence in them”
=======
Fast forward to September of 2009, when the CSA (umbrella organization of all 13 Canadian Provincial Securities Regulators), decide to change the rules/laws in Canada, REMOVING  every mention of the word SALESPERSON in the Securities Act, rules.  They replace that rather clear term, with the term "DEALING REPRESENTATIVE".  To be fair, they did, in some documents place the word (Salesperson) in brackets, immediately behind the word "Dealing Representative".  That helped maintain some of the original info and intent of the disclosure.
Still, one a small step was taken in the direction of "editing out" the term "Salesperson" from the Securities Rules and laws in Canada.  The important thing to keep in mind, is that Securities Commissions did NOT move to eliminate the commission sales role from "advice givers", but rather they simply allowed commission-sales "advice givers" to obfuscate their 'label', to in effect be less clear and open to their investor clients. Allowing them to hide their registration and job role from investors.
They continued (as they do to this day) to refer to themselves as "Advisors" in most cases, despite Securities Act rules and laws against "misrepresentation of ones registration category".  It simply serves investment salespeople better if they do not tell their customers that they are "salespersons".  Trust (and the customer's money) is eaier to gain if they conceal the true "salepserson" registration behind a not-true advisor title...(gaining trust by cocealment?)
========
Fast forward to January 2018 and the new changes quietly put into place have now deleted the (salesperson) clarification from the "Understanding Registration" page of the CSA web site.  It appears that the provincial governement regulators truly do not want the public to "Understand Registration", when it comes to investment salespersons...
This again brings to mind the regulatory double mandate, double-bind,..of having to do what they industry pays them to do....or else.
Ten million Canadians who rely upon their investments to support themselves financially in retirement should not be treated to intentional obfuscation and apparent deception, by the investment industry, and most certainly not by government empowered (but industry paid/selected) securities regulators.
This smacks of foxes guarding the henhouse, and helping their fox friends to pillage the hens, while working for a provincial government which tells the public that they are safely regulated and protected.  It smacks of a breach of the public trust...

 See source for the full article here,
Why Would 13 Canadian Securities Commissions Intentionally Decieve Investors?

                                                      **************************

More on Larry Elford below,
 



 More to come as always..

Monday, 22 January 2018

Former Police Commissioner Affidavit Exposes Crime Rings Among Public Officials



 In regards to our previously reported story seen here Ex-federal cabinet minister Julian Fantino takes aim at judge, cops, lawyers, in regards to Mr. Fantino's filing of an affidavit in defence of Mr. Donald Best. We have previously posted that as soon as possible we would share Mr. Fantino's affidavit, we will now share parts of it as well as a link to the entire affidavit. First however we will share an exert from Donald Best.ca where Mr. Donald Best himself clears the air on a few issues surrounding the Toronto Star article mentioned in the previous post and in relation to Mr. Fantino's affidavit.

 See exert from Mr. Best below,

                                                       *************************

Former top-cop details evidence of corrupt acts by lawyers, police, judge
Four years after the Toronto Star first refused to cover the Donald Best story and deleted all mention of the name from the comments section of their website, the newspaper about-faced and published an article about former Ontario Provincial Police Commissioner Julian Fantino applying to intervene in Best’s judicial review about the Canadian Judicial Council and Justice J. Bryan Shaughnessy.
The Toronto Star article opens with the following bombshell statement:
“Former Conservative cabinet minister and provincial police commissioner Julian Fantino has accused a Canadian judge, lawyers and several police forces of acting improperly and even illegally in the conviction and jailing of a man for contempt of court.”
After the Toronto Star published first, the National Post, the Globe and Mail and a host of smaller outlets carried the same Colin Perkel Canadian Press story of corrupt acts by police, lawyers and a judge. (Toronto Star: Ex-federal cabinet minister Julian Fantino takes aim at judge, cops, lawyers)
Yes, Colin Perkel’s article contains important errors and omissions (some of which I correct below) and no link is provided to an actual copy of Fantino’s affidavit (pdf 8.7mb), but at least readers are now aware of an important story that was concealed from them.
The big story is that the after years of participating in a cover-up, the news media is finally acknowledging that this story is not going away, that it is important and that the supporting facts and evidence are as credible as they are disturbing.
In short, it seems likely that the Canadian news media came to the conclusion that the press could no longer withhold the Donald Best story from the public without further loss of credibility and relevance. It took the news media three months to mention Fantino’s September 28, 2017 sworn affidavit. Even then the media did not name any of the principal subjects in this story of corruption with the exception of Justice J. Bryan Shaughnessy whose name is on the official style of cause filed at court.
I’ll fix that naming omission in a moment, but first I want to address just a few of the important errors and omissions in Perkel’s article:
  • Contrary to the article’s statement that Justice Shaughnessy found me guilty of contempt of court in 2013, Shaughnessy found me guilty on January 15, 2010 at a civil court hearing that I was not told about and was not present for. Nobody represented me at the hearing. I was in Asia at the time.
  • Justice Shaughnessy convicted me based upon several lawyers’ provably false testimony – and also upon a deceitful affidavit by an ‘expert witness’ who concealed from the court that he was a serving Ontario Provincial Police detective sergeant corruptly taking bribes from the lawyers to provide them with access to confidential police information.
  • The lawyers falsely told Justice Shaughnessy in writing and orally on the court record that during a November 17, 2009 phone call with them, I had ‘confessed’ to receiving a certain court order. In fact I said exactly the opposite, that I had not received the order – but the corrupt lawyers lied to the judge. Too bad for the lawyers that I have recordings of the call that prove they lied to the judge.
  • I returned to Canada and applied to Justice Shaughnessy to remove my conviction and sentence. I presented forensically certified telephone recordings, transcripts and other credible evidence that proved the lawyers lied to the court to obtain my conviction.
  • At a hearing in May of 2013, Justice Shaughnessy refused to consider any new evidence showing my innocence. He did not listen to the recordings. He also refused to allow me to cross-examine the witnesses (lawyers and corrupt police) upon whose false evidence he had convicted and sentenced me in January 2010 while I was in Asia.
  • On May 3, 2013 Justice Shaughnessy refused to overturn my 2010 conviction for Contempt of Court and sent me to prison to serve the 3 month sentence he had already imposed in 2010.
  • After court ended on May 3, 2013, Justice Shaughnessy went to a backroom and there, off the court record and without a hearing, trial or transcript, secretly increased my prison sentence by 50% without notifying me. He secretly created a new warrant of committal with increased jail time that he gave only to the prison authorities. He did not file the new secret warrant with the courts or make mention of it anywhere in the records.
  • Later, higher courts denied me the right to appeal my conviction because I could not pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in court costs earlier awarded to the other side on the basis of their provably fabricated and false evidence.
  • I was not even allowed to cross-examine the lawyers and other witnesses that Shaughnessy relied upon to convict and imprison me. I was not allowed to cross-examine the corrupt Ontario Provincial Police officer. To this day, no court has listened to the forensically certified voice recordings of my telephone call with the lawyers that prove the lawyers lied to the court to convict and imprison me.
  • Every judgment of every reviewing court considered only the evidence that Justice Shaughnessy allowed. Every judgment of every reviewing court is tainted by the fact that Justice Shaughnessy and all the reviewing courts deliberately excluded the evidence that exonerated me. 
  • When I could not pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in previous court costs, the court refused to hear my appeal. I served 63 days in prison because I could not pay court costs awarded during a civil matter; with every minute spent in solitary confinement as I am a former police officer. Prison authorities said that solitary was the only place where they could keep a former police officer alive.
This is also the true story of how, when confronted with forensically certified telephone recordings and other irrefutable evidence proving that lawyers fabricated evidence and lied to the court to convict a person of contempt – the Canadian legal profession and courts closed ranks to save the corrupt lawyers, even when that meant sending an innocent man to prison...

   See the source below for the full story,
News media censorship of Julian Fantino’s Canadian Judicial Council intervention crumbles as Toronto Star publishes bombshell article

                                                       *************************

 Now see exerts from Julien Fantino's Affidavit filed in defence of Mr. Donald Best after Mr. Best was framed by a ring of corrupt public officials. Unfortunately the Judge presiding this matter has refused to allow the affidavit to be accepted. The affidavit is to long to post its 73 pages entirely so we will simply post some snapshots of the file. Anyone wishing for a copy of this file can see Mr. Fantino's Affidavit here.

 Here are a few snapshots of the Affidavit filed in Canadian Supreme Court yet refused as evidence by a Court which seemingly does not adhere to the rule of law.











For brevities sake that is all we will share for the time being of this affidavit. Although to my knowledge this story is not related directly to the BC Securities Commission nor the Ontario Commission I share this story here on this blog in because I believe that it is important the public understand just how corrupted many public officials throughout the system really are. These kinds of stories are happening across the country.
 Although we know there are good individuals inside these various seemingly rogue agencies more often then not the ones calling the shots are guilty of criminal malfeasance, conduct unbecoming of a public official and negligence at best and a wide variety of RICO crime at worst.
It is vital the public understand that this is how the culture of impunity and denial has been allowed to take over our financial regulatory systems as well as many of our courtrooms and that is why I share it here on this blog regarding the financial regulatory sector.

More to come..

Featured post

914 Dead Bodies Are Piled Up In Morgues, Free Heroin Giveaways, Rampant Fraud, 5K to Talk to the Cartel Boss, Your BC Govt is Criminal Organization

 Christy Clark is nothing but a mob boss running a massive criminal racket that permeates every level of government in BC. http://bcsecur...