Lindsey Donders under oath answering questions in hearing, exert from transcript January 13th 2015;
This email proves that either Lindsey Donders lied under oath regarding the freeze or she attempted to coerce Blair Paynton into lying to his client which would make her a co-conspirator. If the TD was complying with an order from the BCSC then obviously the order held weight as Donders herself directs Paynton to inform Thibert that “there is nothing that the bank can do about it because they are complying with an order.”
Q As soon as the variation order was issued, did you provide it to TD?
169 Q And did TD release the two accounts that Mr. Thibert was complaining about?
A) There was no cease trade order issued. There was a temporary order issued that included language barring all of the named parties from trading.
We can argue all we want about the language used in the halting of the Thibert’s' account but the bottom line is the BCSC is refusing to take responsibility for giving such an order. The BCSC had access to the Thibert’s banking records prior to the orders issued. The BCSC would and/or should have known that there was no possible way that the proceeds of any alleged criminal offence were entered into the accounts in question. The BCSC lifted the Cease Trade seven days later at the vehement behest of the Thibert’s and TD. If the BCSC was right in its Cease Trade order why would they have the Cease Trade lifted a week later? Why would they lie about it?