Thursday, 28 January 2016



Additional Criminal Charges to be filed.



Attn. Ms. Christy Clark, Audrey T. Ho, and Judith Downes:


 Ms. Christy Clark, this is your first warning that should you not immediately move to settle with the respondents in the BCSC vs. U-GO Brands case additional criminal charges will be filed against you to add to what you currently face. Do you think deleting your emails will wipe your record clean??

Audrey T. Ho and Judith Downes, this is your second warning. You are to issue a public apology and tell the truth in regards to the U-GO Brands case in a major syndicated paper. If you do so we will not press charges and thus spare you your careers. Failure to do so will result in Criminal charges being filed against both of you. All charges listed here apply to both of you as well.

The following will outline some of the charges you may be open to and provide some evidence.

Keep in mind this is by no means a complete list nor have we included all the evidence, that would be a quite lengthy paper. Evidence will be made public on our blog shortly.



At this time we have only filed a charge of Breach of Trust as a public official against Ms. Clark.

Additional charges may be but are not limited to the following;



Accessory and Conspiracy;

Attempts, accessories

463. Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of persons who attempt to commit or are accessories after the fact to the commission of offences:

  • (b) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused is liable to imprisonment for fourteen years or less is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term that is one-half of the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that offence is liable;
  • (c) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an offence punishable on summary conviction is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction; and
  • (d) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an offence for which the offender may be prosecuted by indictment or for which he is punishable on summary conviction
    • (i) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding a term that is one-half of the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that offence is liable, or
    • (ii) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

  • R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 463;
  • R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 59
  • 465. (1) Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of conspiracy:

    • (b) every one who conspires with any one to prosecute a person for an alleged offence, knowing that he did not commit that offence, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable

(ii) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to imprisonment for less than fourteen years;


Christy, as Premier of BC you are the individual that is ultimately responsible by Law for the crimes perpetuated by the BC Securities Commission. Failure to step up to the table and resolve these ongoing issues can be put squarely on your shoulders whether or not you deleted our emails regarding said issues.

Trying to intimidate us into backing down from our Constitutional rights not to be abused in a Criminal manner will only result in further charges against you and all of your associates. I know the Black helicopters and the private Black-Ops teams you have directed against us have been working against us for some time. Do you think it will help you? Or maybe just bury you deeper?



Obstructing justice

    139

Ms. Clark you have been complicit in everything the BCSC has done to try to silence us. This includes our BC Supreme Court Injunction filed against the BCSC that was thrown out of Court by Mr. Justice Bretton without him hearing our case based on paperwork errors made in the filing. There are laws that explicitly state that a Supreme Court Injunction may not be thrown out of Court simply based on paperwork errors so long as the documents filed contain credible and legible evidence. This is not a legal brief its simply a warning if you want evidence of those laws I would be happy to provide them in Canadian Supreme Court.

Is there a reason the BC Supreme Court will not release the transcript to the Injunction we filed?? Or did they just not bother to record it like the BCSC?

The evidence is clear Christy, your obstruction of justice in this matter is obvious.


Defamation and Libel

298. (1) A defamatory libel is matter published, without lawful justification or excuse, that is likely to injure the reputation of any person by exposing him to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or that is designed to insult the person of or concerning whom it is published.


Ms Clark, we now know that orders to publish material that is known to be false or misleading are coming from the top. You have kept silence with us in order to distance yourself this Criminal conspiracy against the people of British Columbia. Instead you try and use BCSC's lawyers to intimidate or hire thugs to harass us. You have opened yourself up to almost every charge that we have charged BCSC employees with.



False Pretence

161

Audrey T. Ho and Judith Downes you are both guilty of False Pretence as you were directly responsible for a newspaper article that states the following among others;

Harris, Cire, Burke and Kwasnek have been ordered to pay $636,000 to the BCSC. That’s the amount they obtained as a result of their misconduct in relation to U-GO.




How can the Commission publish such a statement when supposedly enforcing the law?

The BCSC knows that a disgorgement fee of the type they have issued is by law only applicable in cases of Fraud, Embezzlement and/or other instances where we the respondents would have benefited from ill gotten gains.

By the BCSC's own admission we did not profit from ill-gotten gains. How can such a statement be made?

How can such an order be made? This is all evidence against you.

Christy as the Premier of this Province you are ultimately responsible for this saga which has been now going on for years.


Eventually other charges will likely include Extortion, Tampering/Withholding Evidence. Racketeering, Collusion, Harassment, illegal wiretapping, and surveillance etc..


Keep in mind Christy you have all made us a lot smarter. We no longer keep all our evidence on our computers and for that matter some isn't even digital at all. You have also taught me about the need for fail-safes and leverage. When you go to jail for multiple indictable offences remember what ever you are in there for, we have additional evidence that we will not have tendered. When we realized just the types of lengths you will go to to bury us we took extra precautions to ensure our futures. We will always have a little something extra on you and your associates, if you doubt it don't forget that the BCSC has tried to arrest us.. Did that work out?



Keep an eye out for our press release on the extra curricular activities of the BCSC coming soon to a doorstep near you in hard copy.



Regards

Christopher Burke

Peter Harris

No comments:

Post a Comment